As of October 7, 2026, EPN / Euphorinol is legal to sell at retail in Wisconsin as edible / ingestible. EPN edible plausibly legal in Wisconsin - delta-9-only def, no synthetic ban / mg cap / age (slips); conversion gray zone + pending-bill cav. Controlling source: Wis. Stat. Sec. 94.55(1),(2) - delta-9-only hemp definition (post-decarb testing); DATCP producer license; no synthetic ban / mg cap / age / form rule.
Verified October 7, 2026 (manual) · confidence: under_reviewWisconsin runs a light-touch producer-licensing hemp regime (Wis. Stat. 94.55): delta-9-only ceiling (post-decarb testing at producer compliance), with NO statewide synthetic-cannabinoid ban, mg cap, minimum age, or vape/inhalable rule as of mid-2026. EPN is non-detect for THC and carries no named isomer, so on the statute text it plausibly slips through as lawful hemp - status LEGAL (sev 2). This is a loophole, not a clearance: the synthetic-conversion route is legally gray (the registry codes D8/HHC/THCP as restricted 'conversion gray zone'), pending SB499/AB503 would flip Wisconsin to a total-THC basis (NOT enacted), and a semi-synthetic intoxicant carries full federal + FD&C exposure. No vape or edible form rule distinguishes the two - both track together.
Wis. Stat. 94.55(1) - 'hemp' means the plant Cannabis sativa L. ... with a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis ... as tested using post-decarboxylation or other similarly reliable methods.
As of October 7, 2026, EPN / Euphorinol is legal to sell at retail in Wisconsin as vape / inhalable. EPN vape plausibly legal in Wisconsin - delta-9-only def, no synthetic ban / mg cap / age / vape rule (slips); conversion gray zone + pendin. Controlling source: Wis. Stat. Sec. 94.55(1),(2) - delta-9-only hemp definition (post-decarb testing); DATCP producer license; no synthetic ban / mg cap / age / form rule.
Verified October 7, 2026 (manual) · confidence: under_reviewWisconsin runs a light-touch producer-licensing hemp regime (Wis. Stat. 94.55): delta-9-only ceiling (post-decarb testing at producer compliance), with NO statewide synthetic-cannabinoid ban, mg cap, minimum age, or vape/inhalable rule as of mid-2026. EPN is non-detect for THC and carries no named isomer, so on the statute text it plausibly slips through as lawful hemp - status LEGAL (sev 2). This is a loophole, not a clearance: the synthetic-conversion route is legally gray (the registry codes D8/HHC/THCP as restricted 'conversion gray zone'), pending SB499/AB503 would flip Wisconsin to a total-THC basis (NOT enacted), and a semi-synthetic intoxicant carries full federal + FD&C exposure. No vape or edible form rule distinguishes the two - both track together.
Wis. Stat. 94.55(1) - 'hemp' means the plant Cannabis sativa L. ... with a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis ... as tested using post-decarboxylation or other similarly reliable methods.
| Form | Status | Headline | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edible / ingestible | Legal | EPN edible plausibly legal in Wisconsin - delta-9-only def, no synthetic ban / mg cap / age (slips); conversion gray zone + pending-bill cav | 2026-10-07 |
| Vape / inhalable | Legal | EPN vape plausibly legal in Wisconsin - delta-9-only def, no synthetic ban / mg cap / age / vape rule (slips); conversion gray zone + pendin | 2026-10-07 |
Among Wisconsin's 4 neighbors, Iowa and Minnesota are illegal; Illinois and Michigan are restricted.
Map and neighbor comparison show edible / ingestible. Open the interactive map · Every compound in Wisconsin
Federally restricted. Contested hemp lane now; excluded as semi-synthetic at the Nov 12, 2026 cliff (P.L. 119-37 Sec. 781) Federal detail
2 instruments on file for this compound's framework in Wisconsin; 2 of 2 citations above are official sources. Each text carries its source and a fingerprint that changes when the law does.
066ae72f238df681[Wisconsin Legislative Council issue brief, May 19, 2026:] [s. 94.55(1) defines hemp as the Cannabis plant with THC up to 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; the state definition] "continues to focus solely on delta-9 THC concentration rather than on total THC" [and] "the state's 'hemp' definition does not automatically change with a change to the federal definition." [Statute text not separately fetched.]
116ab44ea3a2157794.55 Industrial hemp. (1) Definition. In this section, "hemp" means the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis or the maximum concentration allowed under federal law up to 1 percent, whichever is greater, as tested using post-decarboxylation or other similarly reliable methods. "Hemp" does not include a prescription drug product that has been approved by the U.S. food and drug administration. (2) Regulation of hemp. (a) Subject to the provisions under this section, a person may plant, grow, cultivate, harvest, produce, sample, test, process, transport, transfer, take possession of, sell, import, and export hemp in this state to the greatest extent allowed under federal law. (am) The department shall issue licenses to hemp producers if hemp producers are required to hold a license to produce hemp under federal law and if the secretary of the U.S. department of agriculture has approved this state's hemp program. If the department issues such licenses, no person may produce hemp without a license from the department.
Compound Laws, published by Compound Analytics, reports the record: statutes verbatim, official citations, enforcement facts and verification dates. Nothing here is legal advice and nothing here describes how to get around a law. A jurisdiction with no verified row is reported as not yet verified, never as legal. Found an error? Corrections policy.
About · Methodology · Glossary · Changes · Data & API · llms.txt · Sitemap