As of November 12, 2026, 9-OH (9-hydroxycorynantheidine) is in a legal gray area (sold in practice, exposed to an interpretive ban theory) in District of Columbia. Not named; only 7-OH is listed (22-B DCMR 1201.1(h)(16)); the analogue statute may reach 9-OH by structure or effect (D.C. Code 48-902.14). Controlling source: D.C. Code 48-902.14 (treatment of controlled substance analogues).
Verified November 12, 2026 (hash check) · confidence: under reviewIs 9-OH Legal? Every state and federal law
The District’s statutory Schedule I (D.C. Code 48-902.04) lists no kratom alkaloid. The regulatory Schedule I (22-B DCMR 1201, current version effective 2018-01-26) lists '(Kratom) 7-hydroxymitragynine' at 1201.1(h)(16) among unclassified novel psychoactive substances, with no isomer, derivative or analog words, and names no other kratom alkaloid, so 9-OH is not named. D.C. Code 48-902.01(d) says the Mayor may follow a federal designation, so federal scheduling is not adopted automatically. D.C. Code 48-902.14 treats a controlled substance analogue intended for human consumption as Schedule I and defines it in three alternatives: a chemical structure substantially similar to a Schedule I or II substance; a depressant effect substantially similar to or greater than that of one; or a substance represented or intended to have such an effect. 9-OH shares the mitragynine skeleton with the listed 7-OH, differing by a 9-hydroxy group in place of the 9-methoxy and by lacking the 7-hydroxy group, and is reported in the literature as a partial mu-opioid receptor agonist. The analogue provision could therefore reach a 9-OH tablet or liquid sold for human consumption, particularly one marketed for opioid-like effects, but that turns on structural or effect findings no District authority has made, so reach is interpretive. The Schedule II entry for opium and opiate, with opiate defined by morphine-like addiction liability (48-901.02), is a further interpretive route. A product with detectable 7-OH contains a listed Schedule I substance. The District has no kratom consumer protection act, age rule or whole-plant ban. D.C. Act 26–38 (2025) and successor emergency and temporary acts let the Alcoholic Beverage and Cannabis Administration close establishments that sell Schedule I substances or products containing them; they add no substance to the schedules. 9-OH is not federally scheduled; federal Analogue Act and FDA exposure are interpretive.
A controlled substances analogue shall, to the extent intended for human consumption, be treated for the purposes of any District of Columbia law as a controlled substance in Schedule I. ... a substance with a chemical structure that is substantially similar to the chemical structure of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II; ... A substance that has a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system that is substantially similar to or greater than the stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central system of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II; or ... 1201.1 The controlled substances listed in this section are included in Schedule I of the Act unless removed therefrom pursuant to Section 201 of the Act: ... (h) Unclassified novel psychoactive substances ... (16) (Kratom) 7-hydroxymitragynine; ... If any substance is designated, rescheduled, or deleted as a controlled substance under federal law, the Mayor may similarly designate, reschedule, or delete the controlled substance under this chapter,
Among District of Columbia’s 2 neighbors, Maryland and Virginia are gray area, the same posture as District of Columbia.
Open the interactive map · Every compound in District of Columbia · Where 9-OH is banned · Embed this map
Not federally scheduled. Not federally scheduled: absent from 21 CFR 1308.11 and every DEA kratom-alkaloid order and notice; Analogue Act exposure is interpretive Federal detail
4 instruments on file for this compound’s framework in District of Columbia; 5 of 5 citations above are official sources. Each text carries its source and a fingerprint that changes when the law does.
ee94645c75a8617fSubsection 1201.1 is amended by adding two new paragraphs (g) and (h) to read as follows: (h) Unclassified novel psychoactive substances (1) (2-AI, 2-aminoindane) 2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-amine; (2) (2-FMA) 2-fluoromethamphetamine; OR (RS)-1-(2-fluorophenyl)-N-methylpropan-2-amine; N-Methyl-1-(3-fluorophenyl)propan-2- amine; (3) (2-MeO-ketamine) methoxyketamine; (4) (3-HO-PCE) 3-[1-(ethylamino) cyclohexyl]phenol; (5) (3-HO-PCP) 3-hydroxyphencyclidine (3-MeO-PCE) 3-Methoxyeticyclidine; (6) (3-MeO-PCP) 1-[1-(3-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl]-piperidine; OR 3-methoxyphencyclidine; (7) (4-FMA) 4-fluoromethamphetamine; OR (RS)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-N-methylpropan-2-amine; N-Methyl-1-(4-fluorophenyl)propan-2-amine; (8) (4-MeO-PCP, methoxydine) 4-Methoxyphencyclidine; OR 1-[1-(4-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl]-piperidine; (9) (5-IAI) 5-Iodo-2-aminoindane; OR 5-iodo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-amine; (10) (5-ME) 5-methyl-ethylone; (11) (BTCP) Benzothiophenylcyclohexylpiperidine; (12) (DBP, DBZP) 1,4-Dibenzylpiperazine; (13) (Ethyl-ketamine) 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(ethylamino)cyclohexanone; (14) (Fluoromethamphetamine); (15) (Fluorophenylpiperazine; pFPP; 4-FPP; fluoperazine; flipiperazine) Para-fluorophenylpiperazine; OR 1-(4-fluorophenyl)piperazine; (16) (Kratom) 7-hydroxymitragynine;
ac96261638f62b05§ 48–902.01. Administration.
(a)
The Mayor shall administer this chapter and, with provision for public notice and comment, may add substances to or delete or reschedule all substances enumerated in the schedules in
§ 48-902.04
,
§ 48-902.06
,
§ 48-902.08
,
§ 48-902.10
or
§ 48-902.12
pursuant to
subchapter I of Chapter 5 of Title 2
and pursuant to the procedures set forth in this chapter. In making a determination regarding a substance, the Mayor shall consider the following:
(1)
The actual or relative potential for abuse;
(2)
The scientific evidence of its pharmacological effect, if known;
(3)
The state of current scientific knowledge regarding the substance;
(4)
The history and current pattern of abuse;
(5)
The scope, duration, and significance of abuse;
(6)
The risk to the public health;
(7)
The potential of the substance to produce psychological or physiological dependence; and
(8)
Whether the substance is an immediate precursor of a substance already controlled under this subchapter.
(b)
After considering the factors enumerated in subsection (a) of this section and after complying with
subchapter I of Chapter 5 of Title 2
, the Mayor shall make findings with respect to the factors and issue a rule either controlling the substance if the Mayor finds that the substance has a potential for abuse or deleting the substance if the Mayor finds that the substance does not have a potential for abuse.
(c)
If the Mayor designates a substance as an immediate precursor, substances which are precursors of the controlled precursor shall not be subject to control solely because they are precursors of the controlled precursor.
(d)
If any substance is designated, rescheduled, or deleted as a controlled substance under federal law, the Mayor may similarly designate, reschedule, or delete the controlled substance under this chapter, or may otherwise designate, reschedule or delete as a controlled substance pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) of this section.
(e)
Authority to control under this section does not extend to tobacco or to distilled spirits, wine, or malt beverages, as those terms are defined or used in
§ 25-103
.
(
Aug. 5, 1981, D.C. Law 4-29, § 201, 28 DCR 3081
;
Aug. 1, 1985, D.C. Law 6-15, § 5, 32 DCR 3570
;
July 24, 1998, D.C. Law 12-136, § 2(a), 45 DCR 2942
;
June 19, 2013, D.C. Law 19-320, § 301(a), 60 DCR 3390
§ 48–902.14. Treatment of controlled substance analogues.
(a)
A controlled substances analogue shall, to the extent intended for human consumption, be treated for the purposes of any District of Columbia law as a controlled substance in Schedule I.
(b)
Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, the term “controlled analogue” means:
(1)
a substance with a chemical structure that is substantially similar to the chemical structure of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II;
(2)
A substance that has a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system that is substantially similar to or greater than the stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central system of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II; or
(3)
A substance that, with respect to a particular person, is represented to have or is intended to have a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system that is substantially similar to, or greater than the stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II.
(c)
Such term does not include:
(1)
A controlled substance;
(2)
Any substance for which there is an approved new drug application;
(3)
With respect to a particular person any substance, if an exemption is in effect for investigational use, for that person, under § 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, approved June 25, 1938 (52 Stat. 1052, 21 U.S.C. § 355) to the extent conduct with respect to such substance is pursuant to such exemption; or
(4)
Any substance to the extent not intended for human consumption before such an exemption takes effect with respect to that substance.
(
August 5, 1981, D.C. Law 4-29, § 214
;
as added May 9, 2000, D.C. Law 13–99, § 2(b), 47 DCR 79118a06d28b22b45de§ 48–902.14. Treatment of controlled substance analogues. (a) A controlled substances analogue shall, to the extent intended for human consumption, be treated for the purposes of any District of Columbia law as a controlled substance in Schedule I. (b) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, the term “controlled analogue” means: (1) a substance with a chemical structure that is substantially similar to the chemical structure of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II; (2) A substance that has a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system that is substantially similar to or greater than the stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central system of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II; or (3) A substance that, with respect to a particular person, is represented to have or is intended to have a stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system that is substantially similar to, or greater than the stimulant, depressant, or hallucinogenic effect on the central nervous system of a controlled substance in Schedule I or II. (c) Such term does not include: (1) A controlled substance; (2) Any substance for which there is an approved new drug application; (3) With respect to a particular person any substance, if an exemption is in effect for investigational use, for that person, under § 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, approved June 25, 1938 (52 Stat. 1052, 21 U.S.C. § 355) to the extent conduct with respect to such substance is pursuant to such exemption; or (4) Any substance to the extent not intended for human consumption before such an exemption takes effect with respect to that substance.
0a308e4df4f17b4eD.C. Official Code Sec. 48-902.04 (Schedule I enumerated). Opiate class (1) is a closed NAMED list (“any of the following opiates, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts...”) that does NOT include mitragynine, 7-hydroxymitragynine, mitragynine pseudoindoxyl, or speciociliatine. Hallucinogen class (3) ("any material...which contains any quantity of the following hallucinogenic substances, its salts, isomers and salts of isomers...") runs alphabetically ...Lysergic acid diethylamide; Methoxetamine; Mescaline; Peyote... with NO "Mitragynine" entry at the M slot. DC Schedule I has NO general controlled-substance-analogue catch-all (only Synthetic Cathinones = 2-amino-1-propanone structures, and Synthetic Cannabimimetic Agents = cannabinoid-receptor agonists, neither of which reaches indole alkaloids). A full-text search of Sec. 48-902.04 for mitragynine / kratom / 7-hydroxy / pseudoindoxyl / speciociliatine returns ZERO matches. DC has enacted no Kratom Consumer Protection Act.Compound Laws, published by Compound Analytics, reports the record: statutes verbatim, official citations, enforcement facts and verification dates. Nothing here is legal advice and nothing here describes how to get around a law. A jurisdiction with no verified row is reported as not yet verified, never as legal. Found an error? Corrections policy.
About · Methodology · Glossary · Changes · RSS · Data licensing · llms.txt · Sitemap